Osteopath Vs. Chiropractor

Osteopaths and chiropractors are actually very different in many ways. While these differences will be delineated further, there are some commonalities. They both have similar beliefs about healing. The stability of the spine is a foundation for health in both occupations. They also share the primary goal of treatment, which is to alleviate bodily aches and pains.

Differences in Training

• Chiropractors are trained in chiropractic medicine. This takes three to four years of study. The courses are focused on anatomy, physiology, biology, and the skeletal system. Osteopaths have more training, and are licensed as physicians. They are doctors who have a more natural, holistic bent. They can prescribe medicine and even perform surgery.

Differences in Treatment

• Osteopaths and chiropractors both can diagnose based on history, visual presentation, and palpitations. However, chiropractors utilize x-rays and manipulation techniques more than osteopaths. Osteopaths use additional techniques of osteotherapy and cranial sacral therapy, in addition to traditional medicine.

Other Differences

• Chiropractors believe that many health issues arise from musculoskeletal system imbalances. They focus on making adjustments in that area. Osteopaths treat the whole body, but definitely believe also that the musculoskeletal system is an integral part of healthy bodily functioning.

General Differences

• An osteopath is a doctor who can provide general care but also does manipulations. Chiropractors are more specialized, focusing on specific areas of musculoskeletal and utilizing specific manipulations and techniques.

Differences in Length of Treatment

• Osteopaths usually treat clients for longer individual sessions, but less actual sessions. Chiropractors often see clients a couple of times a week in the beginning. If you are looking for a provider, this may be the deciding factor for you. Whether you choose a chiropractor or an osteopath, make sure you get referrals from people you trust.